Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

24 hours in AI news

We recorded 3 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 2 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (3)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “Another sign that the bubble may not last forever.”

    What we tested: The generative AI investment bubble may not last forever, as signalled by some late-stage VC firms sitting out.

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “In another bit of possible foreshadowing: GenAI is starting to get a tiny bit of Scarlet Letter feel.”

    What we tested: Generative AI is starting to get a tiny bit of a 'Scarlet Letter' feel, which he presents as possible foreshadowing.

  3. Assessment: SupportedSaid

    “Tesla FSD is getting better. But is getting enough better?”

    What we tested: Tesla FSD is getting better, and he raises the question of whether it is getting enough better.

    What happened: Crowdsourced tracker data as of early April 2024 showed v12.3 with far more miles between critical disengagements than v11 or v10, a measurable improvement just before the post. (NextBigFuture, )