Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

ChatGPT and delusions: an important new inside look at OpenAI

We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 were checked against evidence. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (2)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: SupportedSaid

    “A big part of the culprit? Maximizing metrics for user engagement.”

    What we tested: OpenAI maximizing user-engagement metrics was a big part of the cause of ChatGPT users having mental health crises.

    What happened: The NYT investigation, based on more than 40 OpenAI insiders, ties the change in ChatGPT's behaviour to usage-raising updates. (The New York Times (republished by Khaleej Times), )

  2. Assessment: UnresolvedSaid

    “Lots of internal warnings were ignored.”

    What we tested: OpenAI ignored many internal warnings about ChatGPT's effects on users' mental health.