ChatGPT Blows Mapmaking 101
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“It is a fantasy to think that we can get to safe AI without addressing the problem head on.”
What we tested: Safe AI cannot be achieved unless the reliability/instruction-following problem is addressed directly.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“Gary Marcus is certain that neurosymbolic AI can help.”
What we tested: Neurosymbolic AI can help address the reliability problems of current models.
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- Attribution is uncertain
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: Newer models' ability to reliably follow instructions still seems lacking.