Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Dear President Trump, here’s a deal you can actually make that will make you look great

We recorded 6 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 5 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (6)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “I happen to think a slowdown might be a good idea, especially if we made it now while we are still ahead — that could actually lock in our lead!.”

    Our reading: A slowdown in AI development might be a good idea, especially if the US does it now while still ahead.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: especially if done now while the US is still ahead

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Conditional forecast

    “I happen to think a slowdown might be a good idea, especially if we made it now while we are still ahead — that could actually lock in our lead!.”

    Our reading: If the US adopted an AI slowdown now while ahead, it could lock in the US lead.

    No horizon

    Only if: if the US slows down AI development now while still ahead

  3. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Conditional forecast

    “And I would caution you that if we don’t have a slowdown, really bad things might happen, and you would take a lot of the blame.”

    Our reading: Without an AI slowdown, really bad things might happen, and Trump would take much of the blame.

    No horizon

    Only if: if there is no slowdown

  4. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “Instead, you can go for something that will surprise a lot of folks: you can go for collaboration — just like we did back in the Cold War with the Soviet Union, around things like space and smallpox. But this time around cancer and cybersecurity.”

    Our reading: The US should pursue AI collaboration with China on cancer and cybersecurity, as with the Soviet Union in the Cold War.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: around cancer and cybersecurity

  5. Assessment: SupportedSaid

    Observation

    “China is practically begging to collaborate.”

    Our reading: China is eager to collaborate with the US on AI, contrary to claims it would never want to.

    No horizon Evidence as of

    Limitation: Support depends on reading the phrase as an emphatic description of public overtures.

  6. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Conditional forecast

    “If you make a deal on all this, you really could win that Nobel.”

    Our reading: If Trump makes a deal with China on the AI collaboration Marcus proposes (such as on cancer and cybersecurity), he really could win a Nobel Prize.

    No horizon

    Only if: if Trump makes a deal with China on AI collaboration as proposed