Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Does OpenAI’s new financing make sense?

We recorded 4 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 3 can’t be checked. 5 more are held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (4)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: UnresolvedSaid

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “That OpenAI’s’s valuation should more or less double in a year or so when they all but squandered their former lead appears, at least to me, to be insane.”

    What we tested: To Marcus at least, it appears insane that OpenAI's valuation should more or less double in a year or so when OpenAI has all but squandered its former lead.

  3. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “Even with Nvidia and other propping them up, I hold onto my longstanding sense that there is a good chance that OpenAI will someday be seen as the WeWork of AI.”

    What we tested: There is a good chance that OpenAI will eventually be seen as the WeWork of AI, even with Nvidia and others supporting it.

  4. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “The finances just don’t make sense.”

    What we tested: The finances behind OpenAI's new financing just don't make sense.

Held from this post (5)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.