Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Hot take on Google’s Gemini 3

We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 were checked against evidence. 7 more are held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (2)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: SupportedSaid

    “Google announced their big new state-of-the-art model yesterday, Gemini 3, on most measures better than any other model out there.”

    What we tested: Gemini 3 is better than any other model on most measures.

    What happened: Google reports that Gemini 3 Pro ranked first on LMArena and posted top scores on major reasoning benchmarks at launch. (Google, )

  2. Assessment: SupportedSaid

    “But biggest news was buried in the methods: Google got better results than it is competitors without using Nvidia GPUs, relying solely on their own TPUs:”

    What we tested: Google achieved better results than competitors with Gemini 3 without Nvidia GPUs, using only its own TPUs.

    What happened: Google identifies TPUs as the training hardware for the launch model. This sentence was present in the original card, although the official document has subsequently been updated; by itself, 'using' does not expressly establish exclusivity. (Google DeepMind, )

Held from this post (7)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.