LLMs aren’t very bright. Why are so many people fooled?
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“The second summary, deeply parallel with the first, outlines the process by which an unthinking LLM (without meaning to do so) cons many of its users.”
What we tested: An unthinking LLM, without meaning to do so, cons many of its users through a process that closely parallels a psychic's con.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“Both damning and correct. People who believe in LLMs have played themselves.”
What we tested: Bjarnason's LLMentalist analysis is correct, and people who believe in LLMs have fooled themselves.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“Gary Marcus thinks the whole world would be different if so many people weren’t so easily taken by the parlor tricks of generative AI.”
What we tested: Gary Marcus thinks the whole world would be different if so many people were not so easily taken in by the parlor tricks of generative AI.
Held from this post (1)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.