Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

๐—”๐—œ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ! My conversation with Chinaโ€™s Victor Gao plus a hot take on new essay by Anthropicโ€™s CEO Dario Amodei

We recorded 8 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 7 canโ€™t be checked. 6 more are held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (8)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speakerโ€™s words in this post. A label such as โ€œSupportedโ€ or โ€œCanโ€™t be checkedโ€ is the claimโ€™s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

    โ€œDeepSeek definitely has him rattled. The piece is a long and articulate, but also quite defensive.โ€

    What we tested: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is rattled by DeepSeek, and his essay is defensive.

  2. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

    โ€œAmodei is correct that DeepSeek didn't do anything in terms of cost reductions that wouldn't have happened here before too long, anyway.โ€

    What we tested: DeepSeek's cost reductions were ones US labs would have achieved before long anyway.

  3. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

    โ€œ(Still embarrassing to the US giants though that a leaner, hungrier startup abroad got there first.)โ€

    What we tested: It is still embarrassing to the US AI giants that a leaner, hungrier startup abroad (DeepSeek) got there first on cost reductions.

  4. Assessment: SupportedSaid

    โ€œThe real lesson of DeepSeek is that we can still make vast improvements in efficency.โ€

    What we tested: DeepSeek shows that vast efficiency improvements in AI are still possible.

    What happened: The report documents the training resources of the December V3 model and compares its performance with leading models. Its resource total covers the official training stages and excludes earlier research and ablation experiments; the comparative magnitude is supplied by e2. (DeepSeek-AI / arXiv, )

  5. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

    โ€œThe country that does its best to develop a new tech that is more reliable and more difficult to replicate will win.โ€

    What we tested: The country that does its best to develop new AI technology that is more reliable and harder to replicate than LLMs will win the race.

  6. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

    โ€œMy takeaway is different: the LLM race is an enormously expensive effort to win a race that can no longer be won.โ€

    What we tested: The LLM race is enormously expensive and can no longer be won by any country.

  7. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

    โ€œWe should be thinking about how to sponsor innovation, and recognize that the best funded companies aren't always the most innovative. Going all in on them is a mistake.โ€

    What we tested: We should be thinking about how to sponsor innovation and recognize that the best-funded companies aren't always the most innovative, and going all in on them is a mistake.

  8. Assessment: Canโ€™t be checkedSaid

Held from this post (6)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.