OpenAI Cries Foul
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“This seems plausible. DeepSeek may well have broken OpenAI’s Terms of Service and distilled1 their intellectual property without permission.”
What we tested: It is plausible that DeepSeek broke OpenAI's Terms of Service by distilling OpenAI's models without permission.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“OpenAI may well have done analogous things to YouTube, New York Times, and countless artists and writers.”
What we tested: OpenAI may well have used content from YouTube, the New York Times, and many artists and writers without permission, much as DeepSeek allegedly did to OpenAI.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“Karma is a bitch.”
What we tested: OpenAI being copied by DeepSeek is karmic payback for its own use of others' IP.
Held from this post (1)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.