Sam Altman’s attitude problem
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 1 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
“As I have argued here before, Sam Altman is, despite outward appearances, not a nice fellow.”
What we tested: Sam Altman, despite outward appearances, is not a nice person.
Assessment: SupportedSaid
“It certainly took zero responsibility for what appears to be an obvious infringement.”
What we tested: Sam Altman's response at TED took no responsibility for what appears to be an obvious copyright infringement by an OpenAI system.
What happened: The quoted opening is followed by general arguments about creativity, copyright boundaries, and possible compensation. Across the complete section, Altman neither accepts fault for the Peanuts image nor offers a specific remedy. (The Singju Post, )
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: An OpenAI system generated what appeared to be a presumably unlicensed Peanuts cartoon.