Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Scientists, governments, and corporations urgently need to work together to mitigate AI risk

We recorded 4 claims from this post. 4 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (4)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “He thinks neural networks “understand” the world; I think they do not.”

    What we tested: Neural networks do not understand the world.

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

  3. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

  4. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “the immediate development of a global, neutral, non-profit International Agency for ai (iaai), with guidance and buy-in from governments, large technology companies, non-profits, academia and society at large, aimed at collaboratively finding governance and technical solutions to promote safe, secure and peaceful ai technologies”

    What we tested: There should be immediate development of a global, neutral, non-profit International Agency for AI (IAAI), with guidance and buy-in from governments, large technology companies, non-profits, academia and society at large, aimed at collaboratively finding governance and technical solutions to promote safe, secure and peaceful AI technologies.

Held from this post (1)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.

  • The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: The point of Marcus and Davis's 2019 book Rebooting AI was that the AI approaches current at that time were not in fact getting us to AI that is trustworthy and reliable.