Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Gary Marcus Marcus on AI Published

The US and China want different things, right?

We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 can’t be checked. 3 more are held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (2)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “The fact that the US is apparently using these tools, or the fact that they aren’t likely to be reliable, almost certainly regularly reporting false alarms, and likely full of insidious bias, like so many previous AI systems have shown themselves to be?”

    What we tested: The AI surveillance tools the US government is apparently using are likely not reliable.

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “The fact that the US is apparently using these tools, or the fact that they aren’t likely to be reliable, almost certainly regularly reporting false alarms, and likely full of insidious bias, like so many previous AI systems have shown themselves to be?”

    What we tested: The AI tools the US is apparently using to surveil its citizens are likely full of insidious bias, as so many previous AI systems have shown themselves to be.

Held from this post (3)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.