Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Let Tim Cook

We recorded 14 claims from this post. 14 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (14)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Observation

    “Despite this ostensibly being Apple’s big AI play, CEO Tim Cook and SVP of Engineering, Craig Federighi spent far more time explaining how much Apple loved privacy, before clunkily launching into a series of product updates that appear to both sound useful and heartily suggest that Apple is intentionally trying to distance itself from the AI bubble.”

    Our reading: Apple's WWDC 2024 updates suggest Apple is intentionally trying to distance itself from the AI bubble.

    No horizon

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Observation

    “Apple likely hopes that its privacy-focused media blitz will hide the fact that it’s ripping off everybody’s work just like Google, OpenAI and Anthropic”

    Our reading: Apple is ripping off everybody's work, just like Google, OpenAI and Anthropic, and likely hopes its privacy-focused media blitz will hide that fact.

    No horizon

    Scope: just like Google, OpenAI and Anthropic

  3. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “These are not world-changing integrations, but useful ones”

    Our reading: Apple's AI integrations are not world-changing, but they are useful.

    No horizon

  4. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Observation

    “While it remains to be seen exactly how often you’ll be prompted to use it, ChatGPT’s addition to Apple products feels far more like something cooked up to please Wall Street rather than address a specific need”

    Our reading: ChatGPT's addition to Apple products feels far more like something cooked up to please Wall Street than something meant to address a specific need.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: feels far more like

  5. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Conditional forecast

    “If Apple iced out OpenAI or Anthropic, they could conceivably complain to the European Commission, who might rule in favor of them and order Apple to start supporting their models, in addition to levying a huge multi-billion Euro fine.”

    Our reading: If Apple excluded OpenAI or Anthropic, the European Commission might order Apple to support their models and fine it billions of euros.

    No horizon

    Only if: if Apple iced out OpenAI or Anthropic

  6. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Forecast

    “This deal is equal parts perilous and hilarious, and something that could genuinely end up hurting OpenAI, all while insulating Apple.”

    Our reading: The Apple-OpenAI deal could end up hurting OpenAI while insulating Apple.

    No horizon

  7. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Forecast

    “especially as I imagine most users will only ask it the occasional question and find no reason to opt for a $20-a-month subscription.”

    Our reading: He imagines that most users of ChatGPT on Apple devices will only ask it the occasional question and will find no reason to opt for a $20-a-month subscription.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: I imagine

  8. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Observation

    “I’d also speculate that Apple likely requires some sort of Service Level Agreement for its partners — meaning that OpenAI has to dedicate resources to maintain uptime for Apple devices, which will in turn be incredibly expensive to maintain, burning money with every query on a product that Apple will offer only when Apple’s services can’t do the job.”

    Our reading: He speculates that Apple likely requires some sort of Service Level Agreement for its partners, meaning OpenAI has to dedicate resources to keep Apple devices served, which will be incredibly expensive and will burn money on every query for a product Apple offers only when its own services can't do the job.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: I'd also speculate

  9. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “While Sam Altman is regularly described as a tier-one operator and a superior intellect, this is one of the single-worst deals I’ve seen in my life, one that shows that while it might have domain over the startup world, OpenAI lacks any real leverage.”

    Our reading: OpenAI's deal with Apple is one of the single-worst deals he has seen in his life, and it shows that OpenAI, while it might have domain over the startup world, lacks any real leverage.

    No horizon

    Scope: one of the single-worst deals I've seen in my life

  10. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Observation

    “Apple has decided that ChatGPT is a feature, not a product, and one that isn’t trustworthy or useful enough to run without a user’s permission, or even pay for.”

    Our reading: Apple has decided that ChatGPT is a feature, not a product, and one that isn't trustworthy or useful enough to run without a user's permission, or even to pay for.

    No horizon

  11. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “This was a humiliating moment for the generative AI movement, and especially so for OpenAI, a company that desperately needs good news at a time when the world has become deeply suspicious of its product and its CEO.”

    Our reading: This year's WWDC was a humiliating moment for the generative AI movement, and especially for OpenAI, a company that desperately needs good news at a time when the world has become deeply suspicious of its product and its CEO.

    No horizon

  12. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Forecast

    “Apple can (and likely will) dump ChatGPT at a moment’s notice, replacing it with another generative AI, or ripping the feature out entirely thanks to the fact it introduced it as a feature at the end of a presentation of better, more useful features.”

    Our reading: Apple can, and likely will, dump ChatGPT at a moment's notice, either replacing it with another generative AI or ripping the feature out entirely, because it introduced ChatGPT as a feature at the end of a presentation of better, more useful features.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: (and likely will)

  13. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Rhetoric

    “While this might not kill OpenAI immediately, it’s a brutal moment that proves how little the world actually cares about ChatGPT.”

    Our reading: Although it might not kill OpenAI immediately, the Apple deal is a brutal moment that proves how little the world actually cares about ChatGPT.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: while this might not kill OpenAI immediately

  14. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Rhetoric

    “It’s also a genuinely dangerous deal for OpenAI, and shows that while Sam Altman might be capable of swindling Silicon Valley startups, he doesn’t have what it takes to bend Apple to his will.”

    Our reading: The Apple deal is a genuinely dangerous deal for OpenAI, and it shows that while Sam Altman might be capable of swindling Silicon Valley startups, he doesn't have what it takes to bend Apple to his will.

    No horizon

    Qualifier: while Sam Altman might be capable of swindling Silicon Valley startups