“Scammers will use it, for example, to write “medical reports” that are half-baked (in order to sell ads on the webistes that report such “research”).”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
Scammers will use Deep Research to write half-baked 'medical reports' to sell ads on websites.
Assessment: Unresolved No deadline stated on 2026-10-29 Evidence as of
Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it
Marcus on AI, Deep Research, Deep Bullshit, and the potential (model) collapse of science, paragraph 16.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence as of
- the cutoff for this assessment
- Assessment recorded
- assessment marcus-deep-research-deep-bullshit-and-the-77d4d1-a1
We recorded 13 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2025-02-03. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Forecast
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No deadline stated
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No deadline stated (the release’s reference date)
From the speaker
- Scammers will use it
- “medical reports” that are half-baked
- in order to sell ads
Our interpretation
- “It” means OpenAI Deep Research, the product discussed in the surrounding passage.
- A qualifying case must connect scammers, use of this specific product, materially unreliable medical reports, and publication on websites intended to earn advertising revenue.
- The claim predicts an occurrence after publication, without specifying a frequency or deadline.
Counts as supported if: A documented post-publication case establishes all four elements: scam activity, OpenAI Deep Research provenance, materially unreliable medical reports, and an advertising-funded publishing purpose.
Counts as contradicted if: Failure to find a case during a finite period cannot contradict this undated forecast. Refuting one alleged case would only disqualify that case.
Retrospective: these criteria were written after the outcome was public.
Current assessment
Did the forecast come true?
Outcome: Unresolved
The record was checked, and the evidence available by the cutoff does not settle it.
Scored on a plain reading. The speaker named no measure for this claim, so it was judged on the reading an informed reader would take, stated below under our interpretation. Both reviews had to find that reading fair.
- Evidence as of
- Deadline state when assessed
- No deadline stated
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
The searches located evidence of AI content farms, but no documented case connecting all elements of this prediction. Evidence about generative AI generally cannot establish use of OpenAI Deep Research specifically. Marcus gave no deadline, so the lack of a verified case by the evaluation date does not contradict him.
Limitations
- The search cannot establish that no qualifying case exists.
- Operators may not disclose the tools they use.
Evidence (1 item)
Context only: NewsGuard,
content is produced by AI.
Why it matters here: The tracker documents AI-generated publishing and describes advertising incentives. It does not identify a case satisfying the product, medical-report, and scam requirements together.
- Publisher
- NewsGuard
- Kind of source
- Independent measurement
- Describes events of
- Public from
What would settle it
A dated investigation or verifiable operator record showing scammers used OpenAI Deep Research to produce materially unreliable medical reports for advertising-supported websites.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Marcus on AI, Deep Research, Deep Bullshit, and the potential (model) collapse of science
Scammers will use it, for example, to write “medical reports” that are half-baked (in order to sell ads on the webistes that report such “research”).
- Where
- paragraph 16
- Published
- 2025-02-03
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment marcus-deep-research-deep-bullshit-and-the-77d4d1-a1: Current. Outcome: Unresolved. Evidence as of 2026-10-28. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.
About assessment marcus-deep-research-deep-bullshit-and-the-77d4d1-a1.