Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“By many accounts, AI-fueled scams have exploded, too, and again there is no coherent federal response.”

Two Years Ago Today in AI History: The Tale of An About-face in AI Regulation, paragraph 12. The full statement is at the source.

Our reading, the sentence that was checked:

By many accounts, AI-fueled scams have exploded, and there is no coherent US federal response to them.

Assessment: Unresolved Evidence as of

Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it

Marcus on AI, Two Years Ago Today in AI History: The Tale of An About-face in AI Regulation, paragraph 12.

Said
Source observed
live page, full text, public
Evidence as of
the cutoff for this assessment
Assessment recorded
assessment marcus-two-years-ago-today-in-ai-history-f5ce27-a1

We recorded 13 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.

The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2025-05-16. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.

What the claim commits to

Kind
Observation
Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
None stated. This site does not add one.
Deadline state when assessed
No horizon
Deadline state on 2026-10-29
No horizon (the release’s reference date)

Conditions

  • by many accounts (applies to the explosion of scams) (qualifier, stated by the speaker)

From the speaker

  • By many accounts
  • AI-fueled scams have exploded
  • no coherent federal response

Our interpretation

  • The post's two-year comparison supplies the lookback from May 16, 2023 through May 16, 2025; the response clause concerns the position at the endpoint.
  • By many accounts is an attribution qualifier, not a forecast condition.
  • Exploded ordinarily means a sharp increase documented in multiple credible accounts. General fraud growth alone does not establish AI-enabled scam growth.
  • The scam clause does not explicitly restrict geography; the federal-response clause concerns the United States.
  • A coherent response means connected prevention, reporting and enforcement efforts. Neither isolated activity nor the absence of a comprehensive new law settles that question.

Counts as supported if: Multiple credible accounts document sharp growth in AI-enabled scams, and an adequate review establishes the absence of a coordinated US federal response at publication.

Counts as contradicted if: Comparable evidence refutes the claimed sharp growth, or operating records establish a coordinated federal response covering the problem. Established opposing results across the two components warrant mixed.

Retrospective: these criteria were written after the outcome was public.

Current assessment

Was it true for the period described?

Outcome: Unresolved

The record was checked, and the evidence available by the cutoff does not settle it.

Scored on a plain reading. The speaker named no measure for this claim, so it was judged on the reading an informed reader would take, stated below under our interpretation. Both reviews had to find that reading fair.

Evidence as of
Deadline state when assessed
No horizon
Assessment recorded
Policy version
2026-10-28.7

Rationale

A vendor reported a sharp increase in detected deepfakes, and federal agencies described growing or more scalable fraud risks. Federal detection guidance and public warnings also existed. Those findings give the growth clause some support, but do not settle the breadth of the increase or whether the federal response was coherent. Activity alone does not contradict the latter claim.

Limitations

  • Vendor detection data can change with customer coverage and detection methods.
  • Attempted identity fraud is not interchangeable with completed scams or losses.
  • The federal advisories are classified under official_statistics because the schema has no separate category for official operational guidance.

Evidence (3 items)

  • Supports the claim: Sumsub,

    4x increase in deepfakes detected worldwide

    Why it matters here: This is one direct account of sharp growth in detected deepfake fraud attempts. It supports the growth component within the vendor's worldwide sample, not a population-wide count of completed US scams.

    Publisher
    Sumsub
    Kind of source
    Company disclosure: the company describing itself, not an independent finding
    Describes events of
    Public from
  • Context only: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network,

    fraudulent identity documents

    Why it matters here: The surrounding paragraph reports increased suspicious-activity reporting beginning in 2023 and continuing in 2024, without quantifying the increase. The alert also supplies detection indicators and reporting instructions, establishing federal activity but not the coherence of the overall response.

    Publisher
    Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
    Kind of source
    Official statistics
    Describes events of
    Public from
  • Context only: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internet Crime Complaint Center,

    reduces the time and effort

    Why it matters here: The FBI describes how AI increases the scale of fraud and provides prevention and reporting advice. It supplies another official account of the threat and a federal response, but no comparable growth series or comprehensive coordination assessment.

    Publisher
    Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internet Crime Complaint Center
    Kind of source
    Official statistics
    Describes events of
    Public from

What would settle it

Additional comparable AI-specific fraud measurements and records showing federal responsibilities, information sharing, enforcement coordination and continuing implementation through May 16, 2025.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the sources this register covers.

  • : Marcus on AI, Two Years Ago Today in AI History: The Tale of An About-face in AI Regulation

    By many accounts, AI-fueled scams have exploded, too, and again there is no coherent federal response.

    Published
    2025-05-16
    Source observed
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Assessment versions

Recorded events

  1. Assessment publishedBy this site

    First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.

    About assessment marcus-two-years-ago-today-in-ai-history-f5ce27-a1.