Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“Based on my reporting from last year, Microsoft made around $7.5 billion from OpenAI’s inference spend and $761 million from its revenue share in Fiscal Year 2025, a year when it invested (either spent or allocated) around $88.2 billion in capital expenditures.”

AI Is Too Expensive, paragraph 17. The full statement is at the source.

Our reading, the sentence that was checked:

In FY2025 Microsoft made ~$7.5B from OpenAI inference and $761M from revenue share while investing ~$88.2B in capex.

Assessment: Unresolved Evidence as of

Where and when Ed Zitron wrote it

Where's Your Ed At, AI Is Too Expensive, paragraph 17.

Said
Source observed
live page, full text, public
Evidence as of
the cutoff for this assessment
Assessment recorded
assessment wyea-ai-is-too-expensive-affbc2-a1

We recorded 41 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.

The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2026-05-19. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.

What the claim commits to

Kind
Observation
Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
None stated. This site does not add one.
Deadline state when assessed
No horizon
Deadline state on 2026-10-29
No horizon (the release’s reference date)

From the speaker

  • around $7.5 billion from OpenAI’s inference spend
  • $761 million from its revenue share
  • Fiscal Year 2025
  • either spent or allocated
  • around $88.2 billion in capital expenditures

Our interpretation

  • Microsoft FY2025 means July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.
  • The claim contains three separate amounts. Support requires verification of all three; corroborating capex alone does not establish the whole claim.
  • The revenue amounts are reporting-based estimates. The capex wording permits Microsoft's measure including finance leases, rather than cash purchases alone.
  • The wording does not establish whether revenue sharing is gross or net of reciprocal payments. I do not assume either.
  • The single metric_scope records the compound claim; it does not make its three measures interchangeable.

Counts as supported if: Independent records establish approximately $7.5 billion of inference receipts, $761 million of revenue-sharing receipts, and $88.2 billion of capital expenditures on the stated FY2025 bases.

Counts as contradicted if: Comparable independent records materially contradict at least one amount after reconciling fiscal dates, inference versus other compute, reciprocal revenue sharing, and finance leases.

Retrospective: these criteria were written after the outcome was public.

Current assessment

Was it true for the period described?

Outcome: Unresolved

The record was checked, and the evidence available by the cutoff does not settle it.

Evidence as of
Deadline state when assessed
No horizon
Assessment recorded
Policy version
2026-10-28.7

Rationale

The capex amount has corroboration, but the two OpenAI revenue amounts remain unverified. Reports repeating Zitron's documents cannot independently establish his claim. Evidence for different periods or combined commercial revenue cannot fill those gaps. Partial corroboration without contrary evidence warrants unresolved, not mixed.

Limitations

  • The underlying reporting documents were not available for inspection.
  • The capex corroboration is a news summary; it does not validate the compound revenue-and-spending claim.

Evidence (1 item)

  • Context only: YourStory,

    The firm spent $88.2 billion on capital expenditure (capex) in fiscal 2025, including $24.2 billion in Q4 alone.

    Why it matters here: This corroborates the capex component. It is context for the compound claim because it measures neither OpenAI inference receipts nor revenue-sharing receipts.

    Publisher
    YourStory
    Kind of source
    News report
    Measures
    Microsoft, Total capital expenditures, USD billions, company reported, 2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30
    Describes events of
    Public from

What would settle it

Independent FY2025 records separating Microsoft's OpenAI inference revenue and revenue-sharing receipts, with a reconciliation of fiscal dates and reciprocal payments.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the sources this register covers.

  • : Where's Your Ed At, AI Is Too Expensive

    Based on my reporting from last year, Microsoft made around $7.5 billion from OpenAI’s inference spend and $761 million from its revenue share in Fiscal Year 2025, a year when it invested (either spent or allocated) around $88.2 billion in capital expenditures.

    Published
    2026-05-19
    Source observed
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Assessment versions

Recorded events

  1. Assessment publishedBy this site

    First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.

    About assessment wyea-ai-is-too-expensive-affbc2-a1.