“Both of these companies are enthusiastic parts of America’s war machine.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
OpenAI and Anthropic are both enthusiastic participants in America's war machine.
Assessment: Supported Evidence as of
Where and when Ed Zitron wrote it
Where's Your Ed At, The AI Bubble Is An Information War, paragraph 163.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence as of
- the cutoff for this assessment
- Assessment recorded
- assessment wyea-the-ai-bubble-is-an-information-war-4e65a9-a1
We recorded 38 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2026-03-03. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Observation
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
From the speaker
- Both of these companies
- enthusiastic parts
- America’s war machine
Our interpretation
- The companies are OpenAI and Anthropic.
- The ordinary reading is that both voluntarily supply AI for US military purposes and publicly welcome that work. It does not require enthusiasm for every operation or unrestricted military use.
- For this ongoing observation, I use the latest completed month and the days through publication: February 1–March 3, 2026. The surrounding passage concerns the current military-contract dispute.
Counts as supported if: Contemporaneous records show voluntary military cooperation and public endorsement of that cooperation by both companies.
Counts as contradicted if: Records show that at least one company neither voluntarily participated in US military work nor welcomed that participation. Restrictions on particular uses alone do not contradict the ordinary reading.
Retrospective: these criteria were written after the outcome was public.
Current assessment
Was it true for the period described?
Outcome: Supported
The dated evidence matches what the claim committed to, under the criteria frozen before grading.
Scored on a plain reading. The speaker named no measure for this claim, so it was judged on the reading an informed reader would take, stated below under our interpretation. Both reviews had to find that reading fair.
- Evidence as of
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Both companies publicly welcomed US military cooperation and described concrete participation. Anthropic called its deployment efforts proactive; OpenAI announced a classified-deployment agreement and explained why it supported the military's mission. Both also asserted limits on permitted uses. Those limits qualify the rhetoric but do not contradict voluntary, publicly endorsed military participation.
Limitations
- This assesses conduct and public statements, not private enthusiasm.
- It does not establish approval of every military operation, unrestricted weapons use or responsibility for particular deaths.
- The sources are company disclosures, not independent verification of every described deployment.
Evidence (2 items)
Supports the claim: Anthropic,
worked proactively
Why it matters here: Anthropic described existing military deployments and explicitly endorsed continuing that work. The same statement opposed domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons, qualifying the breadth of its support.
- Publisher
- Anthropic
- Kind of source
- Company disclosure: the company describing itself, not an independent finding
- Describes events of
- Public from
Supports the claim: OpenAI,
helping the government
Why it matters here: OpenAI announced an agreement reached the previous day for classified military deployment and argued affirmatively for supporting the military's mission. It also described restrictions on surveillance, autonomous weapons and automated high-stakes decisions.
- Publisher
- OpenAI
- Kind of source
- Company disclosure: the company describing itself, not an independent finding
- Describes events of
- Public from
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Where's Your Ed At, The AI Bubble Is An Information War
Both of these companies are enthusiastic parts of America’s war machine.
- Where
- paragraph 163
- Published
- 2026-03-03
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment wyea-the-ai-bubble-is-an-information-war-4e65a9-a1: Current. Outcome: Supported. Evidence as of 2026-10-28. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.
About assessment wyea-the-ai-bubble-is-an-information-war-4e65a9-a1.