“However, judging on the revenue both to OpenAI’s developer-focused business and the lack of any real revenue for any business integrating generative AI, I hypothesize that customers — which include developers integrating OpenAI’s models into both consumer-facing apps and enterprise-focused apps — are not actually using these features that much.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
Zitron hypothesizes customers are not using generative AI features integrated into apps very much.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Evidence as of
Where and when Ed Zitron wrote it
Where's Your Ed At, There Is No AI Revolution, paragraph 111.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence as of
- the cutoff for this assessment
- Assessment recorded
- assessment wyea-wheres-the-money-d59c89-a1
We recorded 42 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2025-02-24. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Observation
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
Conditions
- hypothesis (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
From the speaker
- I hypothesize
- customers
- consumer-facing apps and enterprise-focused apps
- not actually using these features that much
Our interpretation
- This is explicitly a hypothesis about the intensity or prevalence of use of integrated generative-AI features.
- The wording supplies neither a customer population, a usage measure, nor a comparison that makes that much testable.
- Revenue is offered as an indirect reason for the hypothesis, not as its usage threshold. I do not turn the surrounding revenue assertions into this claim's outcome.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
The statement is a recommendation, a value judgment, or too open to test. It is recorded, not scored.
- Evidence as of
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
On reflection, this hypothesis cannot receive a fair binary verdict as written. It supplies no threshold, denominator, or clear customer population. Microsoft reported rising usage intensity before publication, but growth alone cannot decide an undefined level of use. Choosing a threshold now would make the evaluator's interpretation determine the result.
Limitations
- This does not establish that the hypothesis was false.
- Subsequent adoption cannot retrospectively define the claim's original usage threshold.
Evidence (1 item)
No outcome evidence: a claim of this kind is recorded and attributed, not scored.
What would settle it
A reformulated claim specifying the population, historical period, usage measure, and threshold could be tested against representative telemetry.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Where's Your Ed At, There Is No AI Revolution
However, judging on the revenue both to OpenAI’s developer-focused business and the lack of any real revenue for any business integrating generative AI, I hypothesize that customers — which include developers integrating OpenAI’s models into both consumer-facing apps and enterprise-focused apps — are not actually using these features that much.
- Where
- paragraph 111
- Published
- 2025-02-24
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment wyea-wheres-the-money-d59c89-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Evidence as of 2026-10-28. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.